Question
Jackson is an interesting historical character. Do you believe we should keep his likeness on the $20 bill? Please explain why – though Jackson’s own actions, beliefs and lasting repercussions from his tenure as president. Only use American Lion for your response
Answer
Jackson on $20 Bill
Jacksons 20 Bill is an important historical document because it is the first bill to feature an image of a black person. In 2016, under Barrack Obama, the American government announced that Harriet
Tubman would take the place of Andrew Jackson on the $20 note. After President Donald Trump
came to power shortly after the pronouncement, this move was postponed and does not appear to
be happening anytime soon. While weighing Jackson's successes against his flaws and scandals,
it might be tough to remain objective when considering whether or not he should be replaced on
the bill. Many historians and researchers are divided on the subject. Some argue that he should
be on the back of the bill rather than the front. Others feel he should not be depicted on any
money (Thompson & Barchiesi, 2018). Others suggest having Harriet Tubman on the currency
to substitute Jackson, and those who think that Jackson ought to remain on the face of the
currency, not be changed.
Other leaders’ take on the Jackson’s $20 bill
An assessment of other presidents or persons in the United States currency is an essential
element of this debate. While Jackson’s misdeed is largely remembered, other presidents, such as
Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln, are more renowned for their achievements. U.S. President George Washington was on the $1 currency and was a slave-owner like Andrew Jackson. About three hundred slaves existed at the death of George Washington at Mount Vernon. He endorsed the slavery law as well as subsequent slavery measures. He signed a runaway statute, which gave slave-owners the right to retrieve a fleeing slave. George Washington also signed the Northwest Ordinance, which acknowledged and forbade Northwest region slavery (Thompson, 2017). There is no debate over removing the $1 currency since he never explicitly denounces slavery as an organization.
Thomas Jefferson is also primarily recalled as a figure for the two-dollar note for his
presidential term and the Declaration of Independence. Many forget the thousands of slaves he
possessed during his life and openly decreased African Americans, especially intellect. At the
same time, he favored a step-by-step liberation that ended in Black Americans' colonization so
that white civilization could not be intermingled (O’Malley, 2018). He was committed to the
emancipation of the slaves, which contradicted his lifetime's number of slaves.
If people look deeper at the behaviors, it can be found parallels with Jackson, both
George and Thomas. If Jackson is to be removed from the $20 note, then Washington and
Jefferson should be removed. It is not enough to evaluate Jackson solely by two of his faults
while looking at the achievements of other bills Presidents and choosing to disregard their errors.
Jackson’s considerate on history
Jackson had considerably more outstanding achievements than flaws; by eliminating the public
debt, by boosting internal changes under his presidency, he was a famous war hero by
demolishing the bank by expanding the executive’s authority. However, Jackson, particularly in
later years, is far too contentious. If he was put to the rear of the currency, he would be at the
proper position, and somebody like Harriet Tubman substituted him. His achievements have
guaranteed him his spot on the bill, but his contentious acts have reduced what he received.
Jackson should be included at the back of the currency, especially with President Abraham
Lincoln, portrayed on the $5 note (Bracey, 2021). Lincoln, whose presidential achievements
were some of the greatest, enacts the thirteenth amendment and the Declaration of Emancipation.
President Andrew Jackson was a divisive character during his lifetime and has only
grown more so since his death. Thanks to considerable historical study, it is now feasible to
evaluate the effects of Jackson’s policies, particularly those affecting Native Americans, in ways
that were never previously conceivable. As a result, many have claimed that Jackson does not
merit to be recognized or remembered, whether through public sculptures or on the $20 note
(Allisot, 2017). To bolster their case, they cite the Trail of Tears, unquestionably the low point of
Jackson’s administration and one of the worst events in American history.
Jackson’s $20 bill policy
It was an immediate effect of Jackson’s policy of forceful removal of the Southern
communities, which were gathered up and brought west of the Mississippi River. The Trail of
Tears During the lengthy voyage, thousands of Americans, adults, both men and women and
children, died in what would become one of America's greatest atrocities. While Jackson was not
exclusively responsible for the uproar, he was more accountable for the policy which led to it
than anybody else. Jackson had been so unrepentant about his conduct is another lousy mark
against his name (Allisot, 2017). Hence makes it necessary, in the view of his numerous
opponents, to stop being honored in any form or manner, which includes his representation on
the 20-dollar note, of course.
Jackson’s $20 Bill Achievements
Andrew Jackson's weaknesses are more known, yet when he served as President, he made
remarkable achievements in the economy. Jackson's campaign against John Adams included his
position against domestic reforms financed by the federal government, which Adams favors.
Jackson aimed to abolish the budget deficit, and he thought public spending was threatening his
goal. It was up to veto the legislation of infrastructures and upgrades enacted in the House of Representatives.
One law to which he was vetoing was a route connecting the National Road that
he felt would be restricted for federal support, a significant infrastructure project during his
administration. He favored internal reforms, provided that more public debt was not incurred
(Manfra & Saylor, 2016). It led to a rise in government debt to better the domestic situation, but
in the end, Jackson eradicated all national debt, one of his most significant achievements.
Jackson achieved success in other fields as well as economic achievement. His mediated
trade deal with Great Britain, opening American trade to Canada and the British West Indians,
was one of Jackson's outstanding achievements in international affairs. Many of the successors
of Jackson ardently wanted a trade deal with Great Britain to contribute to Jackson's success.
Motivation to push the bill
Jackson was also encouraged to accept the spoils system, but he did not establish the welfare
state. Many saw it as a rising unity of the party, and Jackson was keen to reform the federal
state’s functioning (Bushman & Collier, 2018). He aimed to eliminate nepotism and ensure that
people's popular will was honored. His critics considered it corrupt, but his fans stood with him.
The first head of state to speak for and for the ordinary guy was Jackson, likewise. He
was the emblem of a guy who worked hard to achieve success in his life and who could obtain
higher education as his predecessors received their money. He also indicated that education is
not the essential quality to be a politician and a citizen. He sought to fight against economic
injustice and wealth inequalities. He wanted the people to be properly represented. Thus he felt
the administration should have greater authority than Congress (Bushman & Collier, 2018). In
the context of the annulment controversy, Jackson demonstrated tremendous support for and
protection for the union.
Why Jackson’s $20 Bill focused on economic freedom?
Andrew Jackson also reduced the financial institutions bower and gave the people more
extensive economic freedom. Jackson had an early-life skepticism in the bank, which he was
destroyed by speculative and restrictive credit throughout his career as an entrepreneur. Jackson
vetoed the law allowing the Second Bank's re-charter because it is the wealth’s financial
prerogative. He claimed that it violates economic justice and state independence democratic
principles and damages southern farmers (Tung & Robbins, 2016, ). It has been supplanted by
other state banks and institutions. Jackson withdrew government funds and deposit
accounts and eventually removed the bank since it was dissolved in 1841.
Reason why Andrew Jackson’s $20 bill should remain
It was distinct from Jackson. The very first POTUS to come from a fully immigrant
home, born to two Irish Immigrants. Jackson had minimal formal training as he grew up among
the working class. But Jackson managed to become a lawyer and lawmaker by untraditional
ways, laying the route for a prosperous career. Jackson was, in fact, the national star of the
French revolutionary Wars and won the War of 1812. In addition, Jackson discovered the
richness of his immigrants' parents as a Tennessee planter. Jackson, unlike any previous
president, ruled with his particular heritage. A fundamental component of the ideas of Jackson
was the assistance to ordinary people that differentiated him from the aristocratic approach to the
administration of his predecessors (Thompson, 2017). Even when he opened, Jackson threw an
open party for free participation at the White House, showing his devotion to an open and more
democracy-oriented government.
Turn-around point
The huge block from the days of cheese when the ordinary people were welcomed to a
giant slice of cheeses at the White House and talk to the president about state business, was a custom that exemplifies Jackson’s approach. The high-ranking public officials had never before
devoted such general attention, showing that Jackson was the first actual people’s president in
his recognition of ordinary suffering (Tung & Robbins, 2016). However, the criticism was not
exclusive to Jackson. He surely noticed his hasty approach, and many disappointed him. Jackson
was personally known to be violent and allegedly killed up to 150 men in duels.
On his deathbed, Andrew stated that he was most sorry about killing his political
opponents, Secretary of State Henry Clay and Vice President John Calhoun. During the
annulment issue, where South Carolina tried to deem null and illegal a tariff, Jackson requested
the congress to enable him to deploy a military action to South Carolina to confirm. His
aggressive nature did not shy away from the administration (Thompson & Barchiesi, 2018). In
this case, the hands-on attitude of Jackson to the central government to a settlement that would
back South Carolina to escape a political crisis and correct the State’s ship.
Weakest point on the bill
Perhaps his handling of Americans was Jacksons weakest aspect. Declaring them as
inconspicuous and unable of operating the property they claimed, Jackson drove numerous tribes
from their native territory in Georgia to march through the now-famous Tears Trail in Oklahoma.
Jackson’s conduct was not praiseworthy. And although it is necessary to denounce him for these
racist and harmful policies, the morality of his conduct must be contextualized. Regrettably,
minority communities were largely mistreated as a rule in American politics (O’Malley, 2018).
Throughout its history, the United States has expanded its borders, breaching several treaties
without considering indigenous tribes.
Abraham Lincoln take
In one case, Americans refused to pay Americans, which belonged to a treaty, which
resulted in a short war. The outcome Abraham Lincoln condemned 38 indigenous Americans to death. Why should Andrew be exceptional if Lincoln's name remains untouched by this unfair
activity? In no way was Andrew Jackson, a flawless president. Indeed, both scientists and the
public have adequately criticized his practices towards Indigenous People (Thompson, 2017). In
light of the environment of his day, however, Andrew was a modest and respectable man and
leader of the Government that controls and supports its inhabitants. He set a long-standing
example.
His opening in 1829 was extraordinary: Only ten thousand individuals from the West and
South, most ordinary citizens, attended the inauguration. Also, according to one of the
eyewitness accounts, Margaret Bayard Smith, there were compatriots, peasants, businessmen,
children, and women, black and white who were following him from the Capitol to the State
House. Everyone, even Black Americans, had the White House (Markham, 2016). It was a day
of the individuals and the leader of the people.
William H. Seward
If it had not been for Jackson’s example, the aristocracy of William H. Seward might have
been elected Republican administration rather than Abraham Lincoln in the early 1860s. As the
head of government, William may have evacuated Fort Sumter, an option he failed to support as
Lincoln’s secretary of State. As a result, the Rebellion may have persisted, dividing America into
two countries. In 1832, Jackson prevented South Carolina from seceding because of a
disagreement over tariff barriers, which the North supported, but the South opposed. He
convinced Congress to change the tariff while also permitting him to implement it militarily in
South Carolina. In 1833, the Palmetto State agreed to the agreement. Furthermore, Jackson was
America’s most economically prudent president, being the only one to repay the government debt
entirely (O’Malley, 2018). He cut unnecessary s pending and dismissed dishonest tax assessors
who took personal kickbacks rather than levies.
Conclusion
Finally, Jackson’s successes over Britain and the Indian war during the War of 1812
elevated him to a new George Washington. The country had joined this war, in part, to
demonstrate its claim to sovereignty but had suffered one military tragedy after another,
including the destruction of the nation’s capital (Manfra & Saylor, 2016). Jackson revived
America’s faith that our country was more than a flimsy democratization attempt.
For any assistance please contact us on homehubstudy@gmail.com
